To: theothercheek
There are so many, well documented flaws in Miller it is not funny, starting with the fact that Miller's side didn't show up.
What is the Press thinking when they complain that a right is "broadly interpreted"? Is it a good thing when any right is not given as much respect and deference as possible? Oh, excuse me, that only applies to rights the press approves of.
To: theBuckwheat
How come the "right" to abortion - which is never mentioned in the Constitution or Bill of Rights - is not "broadly interpreted" when a woman can have an abortion on demand almost until the baby is in the birth canal???
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson