Me too.
So who's your candidate now? Bill Frist?
You 100%ers kill me.
I'm not one of those, but I do have priorities in support for a candidate for President. One of those priorities is "right to life." That would include someone who defends the right of the unborn and protects the life of helpless elderly who would be killed if were only a matter of "health economics" or simply a prerogative of those who might benefit from an inheritance. I also support the 2nd Amendment and smaller government.
What are your 100% issues?
There's a logical reason to be a 100%er on the inviolability of the life of every innocent person, and that is that a person who has been killed has lost 100% of their rights. You don't have a secure right to own a gun, use your own property for your own purposes, vote, sign a contract, smoke a cigarette, start a blog, or so anything else, if you don't have a right to simply go on living.
If a candidate agreed with you on all issues except he took the very moderate position of wanting to execute, say, a mere 10% of the people who post on Free Republic, I think you'd agree that that one issue would disqualify the candidate.