Her husband, no matter what we think of him, was LEGALLY her next of kin.
Abortion is LEGAL too, doesn't make it RIGHT.
Why is that so hard to understand?? :*(
If Terri had been under the care of an honest guardianship judge, the conflicts between the interests of the husband-in-name-only guardian and his ward would have been sufficiently obvious and apparent to disqualify Mr. Schiavo's continued guardianship. An honest guardian would have sought, and received, a divorce on Terri's behalf (is any divorce court judge going to deny a divorce to a woman who's husband has sired two children by another women and pledged to marry her?)
So, do you think that every person has the right to kill their legal next-of-kin? (I know you don't. But I'm looking to understand your position: what DO you think a next of kin has the right to do for or to their relatives?)