Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: don-o

Her husband, no matter what we think of him, was LEGALLY her next of kin.


80 posted on 03/11/2007 8:11:38 PM PDT by shoebooty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: shoebooty

Abortion is LEGAL too, doesn't make it RIGHT.
Why is that so hard to understand?? :*(


94 posted on 03/11/2007 8:15:54 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX (Bible Thumper and Proud!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: shoebooty
Her husband, no matter what we think of him, was LEGALLY her next of kin.

If Terri had been under the care of an honest guardianship judge, the conflicts between the interests of the husband-in-name-only guardian and his ward would have been sufficiently obvious and apparent to disqualify Mr. Schiavo's continued guardianship. An honest guardian would have sought, and received, a divorce on Terri's behalf (is any divorce court judge going to deny a divorce to a woman who's husband has sired two children by another women and pledged to marry her?)

302 posted on 03/11/2007 9:44:06 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: shoebooty
"Her husband, no matter what we think of him, was LEGALLY her next of kin."

So, do you think that every person has the right to kill their legal next-of-kin? (I know you don't. But I'm looking to understand your position: what DO you think a next of kin has the right to do for or to their relatives?)

490 posted on 03/12/2007 10:43:25 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (The brain: the most complex object in the Universe, other than the Universe itself taken as a whole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson