To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
For a guy courting the right-wing, this was a bad, bad move.
Since when does the "right wing" want the government interfering in family business?
Do you want the government putting your daughters on birth control?
Keeping government out of personal lives means you have to take the good with the bad.
65 posted on
03/11/2007 8:07:27 PM PDT by
msnimje
(Anybody know of a good CONSERVATIVE website like the one Free Republic used to be?)
To: msnimje; WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
"
Do you want the government putting your daughters on birth control?" That wouldn't be a strawman, would it?
Besides, who needs birth control when you can kill them at will at any age.
119 posted on
03/11/2007 8:20:52 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: msnimje
So in order to have a government that doesn't force my daughter to take birth control, I have to accept a government that will use force to keep me from giving her a drink when she's literally dying of thirst.
No deal.
To: msnimje
For a guy courting the right-wing, this was a bad, bad move. Since when does the "right wing" want the government interfering in family business?
I wonder if Scott Peterson tried that argument?
296 posted on
03/11/2007 9:40:42 PM PDT by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson