Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Prosecution Of Border Guards Is Baffling
The Columbus Dispatch ^ | Saturday, March 10, 2007 | TERRY T. MAGYAR

Posted on 03/11/2007 6:03:56 PM PDT by buccaneer81

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Central Ohio cares... The backlash is building. Hey, Karl Rove, Hey, RNC, are you idiots listening??
1 posted on 03/11/2007 6:04:06 PM PDT by buccaneer81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Such self-serving fools. Anyone with half a brain, no, even less, can figure this setup out. The element within the Repub party that is driving this anti-American, pro-Mexican crap, has done much damage to the Repub party and to the waning respect for the Washington government in general.

Seen the latest polls on Congress' popularity??? Pretty ugly.


2 posted on 03/11/2007 6:08:35 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

We care here in south central Michigan as well.


3 posted on 03/11/2007 6:09:28 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
Hey, Karl Rove,

Karl is doing a great job of following his boss's orders. Jorge and his compadres are pulling the strings on this.

4 posted on 03/11/2007 6:09:50 PM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
Open Border globalists want a North American Union.

One more reason not to elect a person who is either for open borders or a gun grabber!
Too many are both!
5 posted on 03/11/2007 6:11:19 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
The big question is, why didn’t the government prosecute the drug smuggler and give immunity to the border guards, who had good service records, instead of vice versa?

That question is answered in the last sentence of this article.

6 posted on 03/11/2007 6:11:22 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
That question is answered in the last sentence of this article.

It is. But the bigger question is why? Who has what on whom? Who is set to cash in on selling out our country?

7 posted on 03/11/2007 6:14:45 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Follow el dinero.


8 posted on 03/11/2007 6:15:08 PM PDT by The Duke (I have met the enemy, and he is named 'Apathy'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
Follow el dinero.

Without a doubt. Patriots are in short supply in government.

9 posted on 03/11/2007 6:16:36 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
This thread is 15 minutes old. When will the pro-illegals, defenders of Sutton and Gonzales, and assorted RINO riff-raff will weigh in?
10 posted on 03/11/2007 6:18:58 PM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
The big question is, why didn’t the government prosecute the drug smuggler and give immunity to the border guards

I take it as a warning of what will happen to any America citizen who tries to stand up on this issue.

11 posted on 03/11/2007 6:19:21 PM PDT by donna (America used up all the good weather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.; Dane
When will the pro-illegals, defenders of Sutton and Gonzales, and assorted RINO riff-raff will weigh in?

I haven't seen Dane in quite a while.

12 posted on 03/11/2007 6:21:08 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
I don't think that it's baffling at all. Although I don't know the reasons, it's obvious that our government isn't just ignoring the laws that were passed to ensure national sovereignty, they're actively working to undermine those laws. It seems that the last thing that our government wants to do is actually enforce those laws, and the weight of the government will come crashing down on anyone who does. It's a warning to others who are tasked with protecting us.

Why it is, I have no idea. There are a number of possible outcomes, all of which bode evil for the American public. Maybe it's to allow major terrorist attacks, in order to "justify" martial law. Maybe it's just greed on both sides of the aisle: The dems want the votes of the illegal aliens, while the pubbies want the cheap labor, driving wages down. Maybe they're looking for a North American (or even a western hemisphere) "empire."

Who knows? But it's obvious that there's some ulterior motive here for the government's actions. What it is I can't guess. But I'm not looking forward to the results.

Mark

13 posted on 03/11/2007 6:22:08 PM PDT by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna
I take it as a warning of what will happen to any America citizen who tries to stand up on this issue.

I have felt that heat at work (a multinational with over 1000 employees at my location.)

14 posted on 03/11/2007 6:23:12 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Just two posts in three weeks.


15 posted on 03/11/2007 6:25:57 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

I think they're trying to avoid talking about it because they don't want it to come up in any of the presidential debates.


16 posted on 03/11/2007 6:27:17 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Just two posts in three weeks.

I hope he is just on vacation. I miss him...;-)

17 posted on 03/11/2007 6:28:38 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

The Judge in El Paso was appointed by Bill Clinton.


18 posted on 03/11/2007 6:30:34 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
they don't want it to come up in any of the presidential debates.

I don't see how it can be avoided in this election cycle. I'm reading comments from NY and Mass. to their newspapers (like The Boston Globe) ready to hang illegals from trees.

19 posted on 03/11/2007 6:31:47 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
The Judge in El Paso was appointed by Bill Clinton.

Shocking! Just shocking, I tell you!

20 posted on 03/11/2007 6:33:08 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson