Brush that argument off from the 70s?
The effect is the same either way. Either the woman personally kills the baby and sticks it in a dumpster or the abortion doctor does. The baby dies.
There is no solution to infanticide if someone is thus minded. But the government has no right to make us participate in the murder. What they could do, if they were really interested in helping matters, is help the adoption agencies. At least then you would have less of the newborn born live in dumpsters.
You don't understand. Those babies MUST be killed. All that remains is to decide who should kill them, and how. Should they be killed clandestinely in back alleys, or proudly in state-of-the-art abortion factories? Those really are the only logical choices. All other possibilities are ruled out, because they don't provide for killing the babies. You seem to be hung up on the antiquated concept that there is an alternative to killing the babies.