Replies

"Not true. Because public funding of abortions doesn't take the courts -- Rudy could (and would) do it by Executive Order, even if we do retake Congress."

Do you honestly believe with a war on terror going on that Rudy is going to be concerned about abortion? As far as I know, he isn't in bed with NARAL, Emily's list or MOVEON.org. They support Hillary.

15 posted on 03/11/2007 2:59:15 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (The Clintons: A Malignant Malfeasance of the Most Morbid)

To: EQAndyBuzz; Alter Kaker

the "republicans" funded Planned Parenthood through title x more in the bush admin. than they did in the clinton admin. If we take congress back nothing will happen; the pubs had congress for 14 years and raised Title X each of those 14 years.

19 posted on 03/11/2007 3:22:23 PM PDT by Coleus (God gave us the right to life & self preservation & a right to defend ourselves, family & property)

Yes, I do think Rudy will be concerned with abortion. Even Abe Lincoln, in the darkest days of the civil war, had a domestic policy (homestead act, transcontinental railroad, etc.) and Rudy will have a social policy. He will sign an Executive Order authorizing government agencies to pay for abortions for military servicemembers and the poor, guaranteed.

31 posted on 03/11/2007 3:55:47 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)

As far as I know, he isn't in bed with NARAL, Emily's list or MOVEON.org. They support Hillary.

FYI, Rudy is the *ONLY* Republican to receive donations from NARAL. And he has reciprocated by presiding over a warm welcome when they brought their traveling D&C road show to New York City years ago.

41 posted on 03/11/2007 4:17:01 PM PDT by mkjessup ("ahhh don't feel noways tired...ahhh've come too faaaaaar...from whar ahhh started from...!")

"Do you honestly believe with a war on terror going on that Rudy is going to be concerned about abortion? As far as I know, he isn't in bed with NARAL, Emily's list or MOVEON.org. They support Hillary."

Life is sacred - adult or the unborn. If we continue to allow abortion unfettered as we do, we are no better than terrorist who lope off heads.

So you KNOW what an abortion is? They suck out the baby. They come out HEADLESS, without limbs and have a horrid death. There is NO difference between what terrorist do in mutilating an adult against their will than what happens to the unborn, I dare say AGAINST their will. No human being wants THAT kind of an end before they get started. It's sick.

Whether they are in bed with Naral or Emily's list or not doesn't matter since they want the SAME thing.

As for the war on terror, there is no earthly reason why that should STOP and we publically fund unborn mutilation - it makes no sense and it's a false choice and a false dilemma. We deliberately murder MORE unborn babies than we loose to terrorist on a DAILY basis.

52 posted on 03/11/2007 4:40:53 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)

Do you honestly believe with a war on terror going on that Rudy is going to be concerned about abortion? As far as I know, he isn't in bed with NARAL, Emily's list or MOVEON.org. They support Hillary.

Why do you support somebody you know so very little about?

Firstly, the President does not stop being the domestic President because a war in ongoing.

Secondly, Abortion groups love and support Rudy. He is the darling of Republicans for Choice, a pro-abortion group and the only Republican to receive financial contributions for NARAL.

61 posted on 03/11/2007 6:30:59 PM PDT by msnimje (Anybody know of a good CONSERVATIVE website like the one Free Republic used to be?)

As far as I know, he isn't in bed with NARAL

Hardly. He gave two pro-choice speeches to them. One said abortion was a Constitutional right. The other praised Margaret Sanger.

89 posted on 03/12/2007 10:18:46 AM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794