Posted on 03/11/2007 2:09:40 PM PDT by radar101
WASHINGTON -- For all the policy blueprints churned out by presidential campaigns, there is this indisputable fact: People care less about issues than they do about a candidate's character.
A new Associated Press-Ipsos poll says 55 percent of those surveyed consider honesty, integrity and other values of character the most important qualities they look for in a presidential candidate.
Just one-third look first to candidates' stances on issues; even fewer focus foremost on leadership traits, experience or intelligence.
"Voters only look at policies as a lens into what type of person the candidate is," said Ken Mehlman, chairman of President Bush's 2004 re-election campaign. That campaign based its voter targeting and messaging strategies on the character-first theory.
The AP-Ipsos poll of 1,001 adults, conducted Monday through Wednesday, found honesty was by far the most popular single trait -- volunteered by 41 percent of voters in open-ended questioning.
The results might have been different had respondents been forced to choose between either issues or character. But this survey allowed people to volunteer any "qualities or characteristics," and a minority seized on issues.
The findings are consistent with an AP-Ipsos poll from September 2004, when 38 percent of voters chose honesty as the most important quality when picking a president. That was more than any other factor.
At the time of that survey, a majority of voters found Bush to be honest.
His decline in the category of trust is widely attributed to the fallout from the Iraq war and Hurricane Katrina in 2005. The drop is most prominent among people 30 to 39, suburban women, married women with children and people with household incomes in the $50,000 to $75,000 bracket.
Bush's collapse in the character test should serve as a warning to the 2008 presidential candidates. Character matters, voters say, and they already are sizing up the field.
Among Republican and GOP-leaning voters, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani leads Arizona Sen. John McCain 35 percent to 22 percent. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich had 14 percent, followed in the single digits by former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas.
Giuliani leads the pack among voters who look first to a candidate's character, issues and leadership qualities. The only area when McCain pulls even to Giuliani is among voters who cite experience as the most important quality or characteristic in a president.
Among Democrats, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York leads with 38 percent, followed by Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois at 21 percent. Former Vice President Al Gore is at 14 percent and 2004 vice presidential nominee John Edwards is at 10 percent. The rest of the field is in single digits.
Clinton leads Obama among voters who mention honesty and strong character, compassion, intelligence and stance on issues. The former first lady is tied with Obama among the small number of respondents who value experience, a surprise given Obama's short stint in Washington.
Policies may not get candidates elected. But politicians can use their policies to connect with voters at a gut level.
Former President Clinton's book-length economic blueprint showed voters he would work hard to tackle problems they cared about. His empathy was a winning trait in 1992.
Bush won re-election in 2004 when most people were opposed to the war in Iraq. He used the against-the-grain war policy to cast himself as a strong, decisive leader. It worked until voters started doubting his honesty and competence in 2005.
"Modern day presidential campaigns are essentially character tests, with character broadly defined to encompass a mosaic of traits -- looks, likability, vision, philosophy, ideology, biography, communications skills, intelligence, strength, optimism, empathy, ethics, values, among others," said Democratic strategist Chris Lehane of California.
Steffen Schmidt, political science professor at Iowa State University, said the 2008 field faces many challenges in the character contest. The top half-dozen or so candidates have had their honesty or integrity called into question already, including relative newcomer Obama.
"The problem is it's almost impossible to find a human being who lives up to the expectations of voters. Everyone has things they've done that they're not proud of," Schmidt said. "Nobody's character is perfect."
The poll had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. For Democrats and Republicans, it was 4.5 percentage points.
This is why Fred Thompson is going to be our next President!
http://draftfredthompson.com/index.php
Proverbs 6:16-23 gives us some priceless absolutes for knowing who NOT to vote for:
These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,
A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.
My son, keep thy father's commandment, and forsake not the law of thy mother:
Bind them continually upon thine heart, and tie them about thy neck.
When thou goest, it shall lead thee; when thou sleepest, it shall keep thee; and when thou awakest, it shall talk with thee.
For the commandment is a lamp; and the law is light; and reproofs of instruction are the way of life....
People say it, but they do not vote accordingly. Wish they did.
Agreed. They're saying what they think a "good" person would say. When, "I'll vote for any dirty SOB who will give me free stuff," turns up in polls, let me know.
His decline in the category of trust is widely attributed to the fallout from the Iraq war and Hurricane Katrina in 2005Because the one thing that has bothered me about Bush's administration is the lack of homeland security.
Interesting, that certainly leaves Hillary out in the cold.
Now she is trying to 'be' JFK citing, "He was smart, he was dynamic, he was inspiring and he was Catholic."
None of which she is, lol. Plus we can dredge up all Kennedy's flaws.
If that holds true in Nov 2008,
Then we are rescued from HARXIST
Gritch Shrillery Antoinette de Fosterizer de Marx de Machiavelli de Stalin . . . de Sade.
Please, God, make it so.
Hillary is:
A Christian - Protestant Methodist But had a Jewish grandfather?
Now "sorta Catholic"
Named for the man who climbed Mount Everest [Over 5 years after she was born]
Tried to join the Marines [But hates the military]
Was "tough on illegal aliens.borders" [But now calls for hispanics to fight the laws and stay in the USA]
Pro-marriage [But now wants to "partner" with homosexuals]
Bouught in the whitest town in America [But is a Selma-Sista-Black]
Voted to go into Iraq [But not really "go and fight"]
"People care less about issues than they do about a candidate's character."
Yep, the candidate of "honesty, integrity and other values" - NOT!!
AMEN! AMEN! AMEN!
This is a bizarro world that we live in. Bush is called a liar by the lying media even though he did NOT lie about the Iraq War or about Katrina, and Hillary is thought of as being ethical. It just shows how stupid the women are who were cited as being the majority who see things this way. Jeez, and tothink that they will elect the next President!! They were also the ones who elected and re-elected BJ Clinton. Fools!!
I can relate to your sadness. The good new is that disillusioned is dis-illusioned. No more illusions and false hopes. A strong dose of reality is a soberingly good thing as a wake-up call.
Indeed, you cannot legislate morality and righteousness into a child or adult or society. That's a red herring, actually. The real truth is that the Left is constantly seeking to legislate IMmorality and UNrighteousness into children and adults. So we do have to draw the line in the very bloody sand.
The "can't legislate morality" line is usually code for "let's have the courts prohibit the people from ever casting a vote on the issue."
I hope we can find someone on 'our side' of the line in the sand!!
The "can't legislate morality" line is usually code for "let's have the courts prohibit the people from ever casting a vote on the issue."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.