Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/11/2007 10:46:29 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jazusamo
Was 9/11 so psychologically searing -- and Rudy's healing role so central -- that some social conservatives are no longer thinking clearly.

How did I move on without Rudy? How did I ever manage without.... that guy.

Or is the trauma of Election Day 2006 to blame?

Oh the trauma.

Or today's polls?

WTF is this dweeb talking about?

How else to explain their premature openness to a GOP presidential candidate whose social liberalism and liberal social life that would have once made such a candidacy unthinkable.

There is no such condition. Giuliani is promoted by MSM for the easy candidate to defeat that he would be.

2 posted on 03/11/2007 11:05:39 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Rudy is Hillary's best hope. With a 48% negitive rating she needs someone to split the Republican vote and he can do it.


3 posted on 03/11/2007 11:07:10 AM PDT by El Laton Caliente (NRA Member & www.Gunsnet.net Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

I like Rudy also, but I'm not tempted to vote for him in the primaries.


4 posted on 03/11/2007 11:11:51 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Giuliani did well on 9/11. Hit the right notes, didn't embarrass anyone. There are thousands of mayors in America who'd have done as well. It's no reason to make him POTUS.


6 posted on 03/11/2007 11:22:34 AM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

The real question is:

DO CONSERVATIVES WANT TO SEE PRESIDENT HILLARY or a Republican President with a Republican Congress?

The only way to STOP Hillary IS to nominate Rudy and be sure to turn out and vote for him in the general election.

Nominating some "fine conservative" who couldn't get any of the votes of independents of Dems in the general election, is a SURE PRESCRIPTION to ensure Fuhrer Hillary.

Conservatives need to take off their blinders and not let the Dems do a "divide and conquer" act on them.


7 posted on 03/11/2007 11:56:51 AM PDT by FairOpinion (Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
He will have to answer pointed questions about his new and old positions. He'll have to square past statements with more recent pronouncements. How does his current opposition to activist judges jibe with his past belief that Roe v. Wade is "good constitutional law"? Is his recent embrace of a ban on partial-birth abortion inconsistent with his past opposition? What about his past support for McCain-Feingold's assault on free speech in campaigns?

Was he lying then or is he lying now or is he just a political panderer with no core beliefs?

I'm thinking panderer. I worry that, once elected, he'll stop pandering and return to his leftwing record from NYC.
18 posted on 03/11/2007 1:00:13 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

He sent mafia guys to jail and supported a policy in which babies were killed (abortion). I do not accept that trade-off


28 posted on 03/11/2007 1:49:19 PM PDT by Theteacher77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

thanks, bfl


49 posted on 03/11/2007 9:34:30 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson