[youngjim]

And I believe Ann is bombastic in order to get herself noticed, which is fine and dandy. But (IMHO) therer is a time and place for everything, and again (IMHO) this wasn't it. There is so much SUBSTANCE we can use against them. That's all. I think we only disagree on tactics, not the final goal. Am I far off?

When you get to the 2+million mark in books sold (10 times the readership of this forum) perhaps you can comment about tactics. Until then the banal assertions you proffer to "prove" your point show you to be quite an insipid debater.

When I see Malkin, Medved, Hewitt, and the other 'conservative' gnats trying to gain publicity at the expense of Coulter; I never suppose they claim to speak for "conservatives." I've never bought a Malkin, Medved, or Hewitt book, while I've got all of AC's. Too bad she never appealed to you--I suppose then she should give up writing to satisfy your sensibilities? Or perhaps wear a poster board indicating that anything she says is her opinion and she does not speak for ironically-challenged "conservatives"?

Writing off her readership as a bunch of horny men belies her support among women even on this thread. Cant on, dude, your mopey attacks on Miss Coulter obviously feed your delusions of grandeur. Glad we can be here to help.

[SerpentDove]

>>When I see Malkin, Medved, Hewitt, and the other 'conservative' gnats<<

You call these people conservative "gnats." I suppose we can throw Bill Bennett in there as well, in addition to any other conservative who dares say anything.

This speaks volumes.

BTW, Al Franken is also a NY Times bestseller. I guess that elevates him above those people as well?

[Jo Nuvark]

One shot. One Kill. You rock!

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

Question of the year:

"Am I the only one who thinks Ann, in an exquisitely executed statement, revealed the craven hypocrisy of her "conservative" audience, which is preparing to embrace Rudy, who is the crown jewel of the gay lobby?"