so he shouldn't be President, because he would actually dare to use Executive power? is that it? is this the best this author's got?
That's NOT what the author is saying.
He's stating the man is so single-minded wedded to the goal of achieving his personal objective - whatever tht might be, that he ignores reason and logic and abuses power.
He is arrogant, egocentric and self-absorbed.
The BEss Myerson case was ANOTHER example I had forgotten.
The Ferret incident is another. The author provides yet more.
But no logic, no reason, no data or facts will deter the JulianAnnistas from their obsession with this individual as the only person who can beat Hillery.
If ONE MAN is the only person who can beat her, and a flawed man as this one is ... we had better hang it all up and cash it in as a nation.
After watching the bureaucrats in the permanent govt. in action during the war on terror, I find myself wanting a President who will start firing these people left and right.
"is that it? is this the best this author's got?"
The piece mentioned much more than executive power that would keep me from voting for Rudy.