Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DeLorean Tremens. Hold onto your flux capacitors, time machines have nearly arrived
Smithsonian Magazine.com ^ | March 10, 2007 | by Eric Jaffe

Posted on 03/10/2007 8:03:48 AM PST by aculeus

One of the most replayed commercials on television right now is the DirecTV ad with Doc Brown from Back to the Future. Doc, we learn, has forgotten to tell Marty McFly to buy DirecTV in the future. Never mind that the 1955 version of Doc never traveled through time, and therefore wouldn't know about DirecTV. More importantly, how's that whole time machine thing coming? When can we rev up the DeLorean and, like Marty, go to our parent's high school dance with our mother?

Never. But not never, never. Just never for us. First, back to the basics.

A physical time machine—a device available at Wal-Mart, as opposed to a natural wormhole somewhere in the cosmos—is possible. You begin with something square. Next, install mirrors at the corners and send a beam of light, perhaps from a laser, at one of the mirrors. The light will bounce to the second mirror, the third, the fourth and back through this cycle forever.

The force of this constantly circulating light will begin twisting the empty space in the middle. Einstein's theory of relativity dictates that everything happening to space must happen to time, so time begins twisting, too.

To fit a human inside this time machine we need to stack a bunch of these mirrors on top of each other, and add more light beams. Eventually, we'll have a cylinder of circulating light. Once we step inside, we're ready to fly through time.

Rubbish, you say? Well, unlike Doc Brown's second-generation DeLorean, which ran on garbage, the model for our time machine is actually testable. Place subatomic particles—pion or muons—on one side of the light cylinder, and a particle detector on the other side. Then send the particles across.

(Excerpt) Read more at smithsonianmagazine.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: timetravel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: LibKill
"A Gun for Dinosaur" a dinosaur hunter goes after T. Rex but does not have a big enough gun. He is EATEN.

Yup. Them critters had lots of rather large parasites, didn't they?

Besides, this stuff really only works way out near the Rim, where space is thin.

Finaly thought: This method is too dangerous, because there is a chance that a photon will hit at a wrong angle, and be faced with equal chances of going in eihter of two directions, causing it to split...instant disaster.

Continuously precessing gyroscopes, that are constrained spacially, are much safer.

21 posted on 03/10/2007 8:53:31 AM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calex59
It works.

The problem is the Conservation Laws.

Anybody stepping into it is immediately sent half foreword, and half backward simultaneously.

Which half goes when/where is really irrelevant.

22 posted on 03/10/2007 8:59:02 AM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; Charles Henrickson; Constitution Day; dead; dighton; Lazamataz; mikrofon; Thinkin' Gal; ...

23 posted on 03/10/2007 8:59:56 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

No! no! no! You've got it all wrong! A crude 3 dimensional resonant chamber would require far too much power and be extremely dangerous, what with the explosive energy of the laser and the total lack of any steering mechanism, assuming you attain space-time breach at any point in a typical human life span. Dimensional transcendetal space time isometries are certainly less accident-prone, but you can't make a working dimensional stabilizer on a table top with a laser scapel and a ball of string. Rubbish, indeed.


24 posted on 03/10/2007 9:00:07 AM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

It's a hoax -- Bob's just going to steal your weapons and sell them to the Peterborough Gun Shop...


25 posted on 03/10/2007 9:27:52 AM PST by mikrofon (Timely Info)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Just curious, are you going to answer that ad?


26 posted on 03/10/2007 9:32:11 AM PST by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Samwise; mikrofon

I think it's an old one from 2005.

(not that time matters for that guy anyway)


27 posted on 03/10/2007 9:34:33 AM PST by martin_fierro (DOPEller Shift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
Have you read the headlines and opinion polls lately?

Maybe he did.
28 posted on 03/10/2007 9:37:14 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

;^)


29 posted on 03/10/2007 9:40:02 AM PST by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

You can travel back, but remember:

"Safety not guaranteed"

http://timetraveler.ytmnd.com/


30 posted on 03/10/2007 9:43:31 AM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

http://www.ytmnd.com/list/?PHPSESSID=7303016077ef602891ec903c066ef2e5&search=safety+not+guaranteed&action=login


31 posted on 03/10/2007 9:44:08 AM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: adm5

"Interesting"

32 posted on 03/10/2007 9:45:29 AM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: calex59
you need to google: "john titor"
33 posted on 03/10/2007 9:45:33 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (So many geeks, so few circuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis; Momaw Nadon; ...
FutureTechPing!
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical
research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and
other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop.

34 posted on 03/10/2007 9:58:02 AM PST by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
It's doubtful that we'll ever be able to go back in time.

If we can't teleport ourselves across space, then physical movement across time is bound to be impossible as well.

But if "remote viewing" works, would it be possible to see across time, as across space simply by developing a hidden capacity of our minds?

But does "remote viewing" work, or is that another crock?

I was amused by the illustrated novelist Jack Finney's (non-)idea that if we recreated the physical surroundings of a past era, we might somehow almost magically slip over and wake up in that time.

Trust me, though, it doesn't work.

35 posted on 03/10/2007 10:00:25 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

You have a point. And if one agrees that perception is indeed reality, well............


36 posted on 03/10/2007 10:03:34 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
you need to google: "john titor"

He said a civil war would break out here in 2005. I must've missed that.

37 posted on 03/10/2007 10:06:51 AM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Hey he's not infallible. We must of just missed that one by luck!!! May be he changed the line by being here........j/k
38 posted on 03/10/2007 10:26:04 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (So many geeks, so few circuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
you need to google: "john titor"

No proof that anything he said was true.

39 posted on 03/10/2007 10:31:04 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: x

remote viewing? you mean "tele vision?"


40 posted on 03/10/2007 10:35:03 AM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson