Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LexBaird

Well, I got that but why?


28 posted on 03/11/2007 12:05:21 AM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: CindyDawg
Well, I got that but why?

Because open primaries let the opposition sabotage your Party's selection of candidate. When they have an unopposed primary candidate, as Gore and Boxer were in 2000, the Dem operatives and faithful can safely ignore their own primary, and use their votes to saddle Reps with unrepresentative candidates, or to water down grass movement groundswells. People like Duf welcome that, because it skews the Party leftward, where he has been trying to drag it for years.

30 posted on 03/11/2007 1:31:16 PM PDT by LexBaird (98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: CindyDawg
Well, I got that but why?

Because open primaries let the opposition sabotage your Party's selection of candidate. When they have an unopposed primary candidate, as Gore and Boxer were in 2000, the Dem operatives and faithful can safely ignore their own primary, and use their votes to saddle Reps with unrepresentative candidates, or to water down grass movement groundswells. People like Duf welcome that, because it skews the Party leftward, where he has been trying to drag it for years.

31 posted on 03/11/2007 1:31:21 PM PDT by LexBaird (98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson