I'm a "shrill compromiser"?
Do you have any clue how stupid that sounds?
No, you don't.
Your reading comprehension skills are questionable, too. I haven't pushed Rudy on this thread, and when you asked me who I supported I answered directly.
Perhaps I should have typed in crayon font.
And here's a little bonus fact for you. I know Shakespeare. Using a phrase from him to insult me, doth not make it not an insult.
You can continue with your sanctimonious approach as if you are the only type of conservative who owns this forum and the rest of us are stupid, ignorant, sinful, or uneducated.
Or we start writing in crayon font to you.
Let's see. You said, " I have previously stated that I like Newt the most, but am not sure that he'll run, and that he probably can't win if he does. " Then you proceed to rip on another candidate -- a socon -- from the safety of your uncommitted "probably can't win" base. No, I think you're the one who ends up looking stupid, and cowardly.
Then later on you say, in the same post... "I'll just let you convince the world that Duncan Hunter should and can win." And I said, "Thank you." But you continue to come back onto this thread. Again, that makes you look stupid and you don't keep your word.
If you know Shakespeare then you should be able to recognize a few expressions. But you didn't. So you don't look so smart there, either.
You can continue with your sanctimonious approach as if you are the only type of conservative who owns this forum and the rest of us are stupid, ignorant, sinful, or uneducated.
***Almost every time you post, you exaggerate the other side in straw argumentation. Of course I don't vew "the rest of us" as stupid, ignorant, sinful, or uneducated", I will let the readers decide for themselves. You've given them enough material to help them decide.