Posted on 03/09/2007 1:44:52 PM PST by dead
BAGHDAD, Iraq, March 6, 2007 — Two suicide bombers killed at least 149 Shiite pilgrims today in the town of Hillah south of Baghdad.
The pilgrims were making their way toward the town of Karbala, 60 miles south of Baghdad, for a religious festival due to start Friday. The bombers had mingled with the crowd when it stopped at a roadside tent, where they detonated the explosive vests hidden under their clothes.
Iraqi officials say Sunni insurgents are systematically targeting Shiite pilgrims ahead of this weekend's festival of Arbain, which draws believers from all over the country. At least 12 other attacks have been made against pilgrims over the past two days, killing more than two dozen people.
Impact of the Troop Surge
In previous years these pilgrims have been protected by Shiite militias, but in the past three weeks as the U.S. military has started to send more soldiers into Baghdad as part of a planned surge of 21,000 troops, many of these militiamen have disappeared from the streets. This leaves the pilgrims more vulnerable to attack.
U.S. troops have been surprised at how quickly the militias have melted away. Six hundred U.S. troops have pushed into Sadr City over the past three days, and while it's the stronghold of anti-American cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, so far they have met no resistance.
"We still see some militias, but I think their activities have decreased," one man told ABC News,
This is in stark contrast to the last big U.S. push into Sadr City in 2004, which led to fierce street fighting with heavy casualties on both sides.
The main reason appears to be that for now the militias have melted away rather than confront the well-armed Americans. Despite recent deadly attacks outside Baghdad, many people who spoke to ABC News inside the city say they sense things have started to change since the U.S. surge began.
Commerce is making a comeback — markets are more crowded and some stores that had closed have reopened — and death squad killings are down.
But Iraq is still fighting a sectarian war. The U.S. surge may have changed the terms of engagement in Baghdad for the time being, but it remains to be seen whether that has changed the direction of the war.
In previous years these pilgrims have been protected by Shiite militias, but in the past three weeks as the U.S. military has started to send more soldiers into Baghdad as part of a planned surge of 21,000 troops, many of these militiamen have disappeared from the streets. This leaves the pilgrims more vulnerable to attack.
I don’t even know what point the typist is trying to make here.
Because the troop surge has chased away the militias, the pilgrims are more vulnerable to calmer violence, though we have no stats to back up this nonsensical assertion.
As Felix Unger brilliantly noted, “Murray… I don’t have time to unravel your logic.”
Calmer violence is better than violent calmness, or something like that.
I've been chewing on that blurb for a few minutes now.
Kind of like how liberals question, "How can the crime rate be going down when so many people are in jail!?!"
"I ain't got no eddication. I jes' gone strate to Journalism Skool."
Now they just strap on strings of firecrackers?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.