Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EdLake; muawiyah

well, I would say this - what return address do you think they would have put on the letters, their own? I mean, why did they even put a return address on the letter. so the return address had to be a "stunt".


87 posted on 03/10/2007 9:10:06 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview

The return address was a stunt. I will give you the
specifics tomorrow about the area. Its' very late right
now and we are all about to LOSE a hour! EGADS....JJ61


89 posted on 03/10/2007 10:53:45 PM PST by JerseyJohn61 (Better Late Than Never.......sometimes over lapping is worth the effort....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview
well, I would say this - what return address do you think they would have put on the letters, their own? I mean, why did they even put a return address on the letter. so the return address had to be a "stunt".

They didn't put a return address on the media letters. So, yes, why did they put a return address on the senate letters?

muawiyah says the letters were mailed in Florida, and it was just PURE ACCIDENT that they were postmarked in New Jersey, and it was a PURE COINCIDENCE that there was a New Jersey return address on the senate letters. Could anyone in their right mind believe such a thing?

And why did the culprit put a scrambled return address on the senate letters? Why wouldn't al Qaeda just use the real address of a real grade school? Why scramble the address so there would be no possibility that the anthrax-filled letters might be returned to a REAL school?

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com

97 posted on 03/11/2007 7:51:34 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson