[3IDVET]

Sorry, didn't mean to OFFEND you, Just my opinion!!!! I still think it was part of the over all attack, the over all plan was supposed to be much worse..Again, just my opinion, please don't post another link to your Analyzing the Anthrax Attacks book selling sight..I read through some of the stuff, especially the Did AQ do it? Once you started quoiting the nyt, wp ect.....Thats where I stopped reading and put you in the moonbat camp or camp conspiracy as you call it.....Later 3IDVET

[muawiyah]

It's worth noting that the Washington Post published a considerable amount of information during the early phases of the investigation that's available nowhere else.

Now, at this late date, you have to pay to get that info. Some of it is little more than raw FBI reports, the very stuff which became impossible to get once the investigation was "stovepiped".

Many of us who work the anthrax threads began to feel that someone inside the FBI at a high position was suppressing the investigation. Turned out that was true ~ FBI Director Robert Mueller was the bad actor. His actions set the anthrax investigation back years.

[EdLake]

Sorry, didn't mean to OFFEND you

After arguing about the anthrax investigation on the Internet for five and a half years, it's almost impossible to offend me. I've been called every name in the book. I've even been threatened with a lawsuit because I disagreed with nonsense printed by a so-called "journalist". I sometimes get called names ten times a day -- or more.

I keep all my e-mails. As of this moment, I have 30,228 emails in my archives, not including those exchanged with the media or with the FBI, which I file separately.

I could go through them and easily find hundreds of insults hurled at me because I've stated that Dr. Hatfill is innocent since mid-2002 (which people are gradually beginning to realize is true).

I could find more hundreds of insults hurled at me because I stated that there was no "sophisticated silica coating" on the anthrax spores (which an FBI scientist clearly stated last fall was a solid FACT).

And I could probably find thousands of insults hurled at me because I could provide solid FACTS which clearly show that al Qaeda was NOT behind the anthrax attacks. I also save copies of these FreeRepublic threads on that subject.

It's fascinating to me how people rationalize things in order to continue believing what they want to believe. They seem to feel because I cannot prove that it is impossible for al Qaeda to have been behind the anthrax attacks, their beliefs are as valid as any FACTS. They also seem to believe because all the facts about the case are not known, someday facts could be found which prove them to be right. As long as they can't be proven wrong, people can rationalize anything.

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com