Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JerseyJohn61
Mr. Lake, no matter how piously pure that we maybe believing ourselves to viewing the Anthrax case totally objectively, we all have a certain amount of color tinting to our eyeglasses.

While it's certainly true that everything we think and believe is a summation of everything we've learned and that has gone on in our lives since we were born, it is still possible to look at things objectively. The problem is: people who do NOT look at things objectively will say you aren't doing it, either, since you do not agree with them.

If you are looking at things objectively, you cannot use logic which says that, regardless of what the facts say, there could be some information not yet made public which will support a different conclusion. It may be true, but it's really just an excuse for refusing to accept or even look at the facts.

If you are looking at things objectively, you cannot assume that everyone who disagrees with you is lying.

If you are looking at things objectively, you cannot simply look for alternative explanations for everything that does not fit your beliefs.

I had no particular interest in who sent the anthrax when I began doing my research. I was just tired of listening to nothing but opinions and speculation which seemed to totally ignore the facts. So, being an analyst, I thought it might be interesting to look at the facts to see what the facts had to say. And, that's what I did.

But, people who disagree with me can claim that I just twisted things to fit my beliefs, and I cannot prove them wrong. So, I'm immune to opinions and speculation and only change my analysis when confronted with FACTS.

Yes, facts can be twisted to fit any theory. That's why we have courts of law. And that's why we have "scientific method". And that's why I have to rely on MY analysis until proven wrong by solid facts.

Ed at

149 posted on 03/14/2007 8:34:35 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: EdLake; Battle Axe; jpl; Shermy
So the right wing twists more facts than the left wing?

Please continue to ask that as the facts of the "Plame Game"
continues to roll out and beyond the LIES that have been
presented by the LIBERAL MSM.

Valerlie Plame and her husband Wilson CONSPIRED to harm the
Bush Administration.

Clinton fired 123 federal judges. 93 when he as he stepped
into office. An Arkansas Judge that was presiding over the
"WHITE WATER" situation.

At my clock , there are 715 days that have gone on by
since Mister Sandy-Samuel-Berger......Has had ......
had said.....I mean......I mean!!!! HE SAID HE WOULD
TAKE A POLYGRAPH...........HE HAS NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As A Requisite...He must!!! APRIL THIRD IT WILL BE
3 YEARS. This for a man who stole and destroyed probably
PERMANTALY government records.

Your statements in many past posts and threads do affirm
that you seem to favor those "on the left" of views.

However, your statement made in the 2nd paragraph of your
post #149, will be both the salvation of your thinking,
postulating, or drive for the truth.

That is after I introduce more truth than you know of.

The subjugation is on me. If you wish to know better, send a private.....JJ61

P.S. Just be prepared to know that SUBJECTIVE info can
be had....JJ61 PPS ppps. Please be aware, that folks on the left are often left looking like the "Pink Code" transvestite that Valerie Plame had looming in her her background....JJJ61
150 posted on 03/17/2007 1:15:57 AM PDT by JerseyJohn61 (Better Late Than Never.......sometimes over lapping is worth the effort....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson