I think you need to explain why the supremacy clause does not pertain to the BOR. Is the constitution and the supremacy clause not part of the "LAW OF THE LAND"?
Is the jurisdiction of the constitution then Washington D.C. only?
Where is federal jurisdiction if not over the states in the limitied manner specifically enumerated by the constitutiona and BOR?
http://www.drudgereport.com/04-7041a.pdf
Many of the arguments and questions are actually answered, directly, in the pdf document..
I found it to be an easy read, compared to some legal decisions, and straightforward, and understandable.. plain language, so to speak, not the usual legalese..
I believe the arguments made in this case will be the basis more many more favorable decisions in the future..