That is covered pretty well in the decision. Sorry it shoots down your entire posting history on this forum.
True enough. It's also covered pretty well in the plethora of decisions concluding a collective right.
I was curious, therefore, why the poster concluded that "it is clear as a bell that the 2nd Amendment is about the right of the individual to bear arms".
Since you're not that poster, and since you really have nothing to add to the discussion (other than some vague reference to the decision), I think we're done.