Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Who were Miller's attorneys going to use to testify in court as to whether or not a weapon was suitable for a state's Militia?

They could have used the act's own words, which specifically exempted the military from the regulations about short barreled rifles and shotguns. The military can have all the short barreled shotguns it wants. Law enforcement was also exempt, and police assume a paramilitary role in times of emergency. It was illogical for the court to refuse to see that "use of a 'shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length' at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia . . ." when the law was written so that only military and paramilitary organizations could have them.

1,020 posted on 03/11/2007 5:19:25 AM PDT by sig226 (see my profile for the democrat culture of corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 939 | View Replies ]


To: sig226
"which specifically exempted the military from the regulations about short barreled rifles and shotguns."

The military was exempted from the tax, yes. What about the state Militia? Was a Militia member exempt when he went to purchase such a weapon? If "we the people" are the Militia, then ....

1,035 posted on 03/11/2007 10:19:38 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1020 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson