Nice...
1 posted on
03/09/2007 8:10:04 AM PST by
cryptical
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
To: cryptical
Will this now go to the SCOTUS? I gotta say, I love our chances. I just hope Kennedy doesn't look to the UN or other foreign governments for guidance!
83 posted on
03/09/2007 8:40:40 AM PST by
KoRn
(FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT!)
To: cryptical
Its more than ground-breaking. Its mean EVERY gun control law that inhibits or prevents people from exercising their right of self-defense is on its face, unconstitutional. Every gun control law would have to meet the same kind of standard that laws affecting freedom of speech must and under such a standard very few of the 30,000 laws on the books could pass constitutional muster. So if a total ban on handguns is unconstitutional, I think even less restrictive laws fail that test if they in any way impair an individual's fundamental right to self-defense. So the U.S Supreme Court may finally have to adress just how broad the scope of the Second Amendment is and my view its very broad with respect to that individual right it enshrines - not just for the residents of DC but for ALL Americans.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
86 posted on
03/09/2007 8:41:44 AM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: cryptical
To: cryptical; Joe Brower; traviskicks; Admin Moderator; Sidebar Moderator
If this is indeed true, I think this belongs in the Breaking News sidebar.
90 posted on
03/09/2007 8:42:17 AM PST by
jmc813
(Rudy Giuliani as the Republican nominee is like Martin Luther being Pope.)
To: cryptical
95 posted on
03/09/2007 8:45:43 AM PST by
Inyo-Mono
(If you don't want people to get your goat, don't tell them where it's tied.)
To: cryptical
PDF of the ruling has been posted
here! This is unbelievable!
97 posted on
03/09/2007 8:48:24 AM PST by
jmc813
(Rudy Giuliani as the Republican nominee is like Martin Luther being Pope.)
To: dcwusmc
98 posted on
03/09/2007 8:49:35 AM PST by
jmc813
(Rudy Giuliani as the Republican nominee is like Martin Luther being Pope.)
To: cryptical
The People's Democratic? Republic? of Washington, D.C. gets a sharp stick in the eye !!! I love it !!!
To: cryptical
First story I saw today. Huge news. For those of use who have been arguing all along that ALL of the Bill of Rights refers to individual rights it's a vindication. They must be hanging black crepe in the Brady Bunker.
To: cryptical
Still don't see this on the wires/MSM.
105 posted on
03/09/2007 8:55:26 AM PST by
VeniVidiVici
(¡El proletariado del mundo, une! - Xuygo Chavez)
To: cryptical
OK!
Now, how long before it becomes effective?
106 posted on
03/09/2007 8:56:35 AM PST by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
107 posted on
03/09/2007 8:57:56 AM PST by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have two speeds: "graze" and "stampede".)
To: cryptical
A question that needs to be asked and answered is, by the terms of the Second Amendment an individual has the right to bear arms. Then why does a person need a conceal carry permit to be able to carry a weapon concealed?
108 posted on
03/09/2007 8:58:05 AM PST by
AIC
To: cryptical
bookmarked for historical purposes...
To: cryptical
WOW! Very clear and concisely worded judgment, very strong.
114 posted on
03/09/2007 9:00:54 AM PST by
Godzilla
(Got Jesus? Its hell with out Him.)
To: cryptical
"To summarize, we conclude that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms."
Whoa!!! This is going to put some panties in a wad! I can't wait to see how the lefties, MSM and government gun-grabbers spin this one. Perhaps they'll have the judges picked up for psychiatric evaluation.
To: cryptical
Wow, this is HUGH!
And series. When the DC Circuit talks the others listen.
(When Rudy here's this he'll need a case of Bromo)
119 posted on
03/09/2007 9:06:44 AM PST by
Condor51
(Rudy makes John Kerry look like a Right Wing 'Gun Nut' Extremist)
To: cryptical
3 judge panel in DC, finds an individual right in the BoR? This is Onion or something, isn't it? Because there's no Christmas in March.
Is there?
To: cryptical
122 posted on
03/09/2007 9:09:07 AM PST by
Natchez Hawk
("Truth: the anti-drug war")
To: cryptical
Alright! As a native Washingtonian and as someone whose sister was held up at gun point in a 'nice' area of DC, I'm happy to hear this.
123 posted on
03/09/2007 9:10:40 AM PST by
radiohead
(They call me DOCTOR radiohead.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
