▲ Click the box to see where he stands on the issues. ▲
Let me know if you'd like to join the Fred Thompson ping list.
I'm putting $50 on Fred to win.
Forget Sheen, Russert & Farrell, trio of liberal leftist RAT H'weird. Connecting with the communist backed moveon.org spells credibility problems big time.
Posted in USENET Before the war
"anti-war" Protestors Are Instigating War Sun, Oct 6 2002
"anti-war" Protestors Are Instigating War Here's how. If Saddam did
not see american protestors he would a little more of a chance for him
to abide by the UN resolutions and disarm by allowng in inspectors.
But, knowing how Saddam works, seeing anti-war protestors most likely
gives him a false sense of security and encouragement to thumb his
nose to the UN. If anti-war protestors were sincerely against war why
are they protesting the USA and not the UN? After all, it is the
United Nations who has failed to enforce their own resolutions-16 of
them in all and Saddam has not abided by them.
Failure to get Saddam to abide by these resolutions results in the UN
having no more authority in the world. It is the UN that should be
protested, not the US. While the US and Britain has been enforcing the
no-fly zone in Iraq we have been fired at hundreds of times by Iraqi
forces below which in itself is against the cease-fire agreement
signed by Saddam Hussein.
That's why I feel that anti-war protestors are not as much against war
as they are trying to make a political statement against President
Bush. If it were ANWR they'd protest anyways and the fact that they
have not been protesting the UN's falure to make Saddam comply to
their resolutions shows that they are protesting just to protest.
Nobody in their right mind would protest a convenional war knowing
that in a year or two we would be facing the equivalent (only worse
and more serious) of a Cuban Missile Crisis with Iraq. To protest this
war is to be for nuclear crisis. To be against disarming Saddam is to
encourage a new nuclear arms race. It is not Bush who has been the war-
monger. Bush has been drastically cutting our nuclear warheads
unilaterally while Saddam has been building them.
How much longer do these protestors think the US can continue cutting
our nuclear arsenal when enemy nations are allowed to build theirs?
These are not anti-war protestors. These are people with a political
agenda. If they were really against war they would be protesting the
UN's failure to disarm Saddam Hussein and you know, they just may be
able to win peace that way. Oh, but they may not want peace if it
means a political victory for George Bush for finally getting the
United Nations to effectively do their job and disarm Saddam Hussein
through peace. Show some back bone, protestors, otherwise you're as
irrevelent as the United Nations itself and with no credibility.
Let me know if you'd like to join the Fred Thompson ping list.
FRED THOMPSON THREAD --- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1794377/posts
pping
Yeah, B J., just go in there and do it.
Right.
By that definition, the war DID work. We no longer worry about WMD being developed by the Iraqi government and being sold or given to our enemies.
BUZZZZZ!
Trying to keep the "Thompson for President" buzz going.
_______
by posting 4 year old conversations with a guy who played on M*A*S*H?
Fred's gonna need something a tad more current to keep (get?) a buzz going. JMO.
Mike farrell isnt he the guy who hasnt worked since MASH went off the air?
If Fred would run I'd vote for him any party. Think how he'd demolish Hitlery with one look!
Considering the others in the race I will pick Fred every time.