Posted on 03/08/2007 11:03:19 AM PST by Coleus
Honorable Thomas Zampino of the Family Division of the New Jersey Superior Court has ordered penal charges against a home-schooling mother of seven. According to a report by Matt Bowman on the website constitutionallycorrect.com, the mother's supposed infraction is home-schooling her children without supervision from the local school board - a right explicitly upheld in New Jersey law. According to the court's opinion, Tara Hamilton is the defendant in a suit brought against her by her recently estranged husband, Stephen Hamilton. Stephen brought the suit in an attempt to force Tara to enroll their school-age children, aged 12 to 4 years, in parochial school because he believes that they are not receiving an adequate education while being home-schooled. All seven children currently reside with Tara. According to the court document, Stephen claims that "continued home schooling is not in the children's best interest, they lack socialization skills and that it is too difficult for the mother to teach the children at five different grade levels. The father argues that the children are not receiving an education equivalent to a public or parochial school."
Prior to the marital discord that led to this suit, the Hamiltons had similarly home-schooled all of their school-age children. In an effort to implement "certain basic requirements and safeguards", the judge ordered Tara to submit her home-schooling children to standardized tests supplied by the local school district despite NJ law which says, "A child educated elsewhere than at school is not required to sit for a state or district standardized test." The judge also ordered the local school board to file a suit against Tara in order to be able to "evaluate the instruction in the home," a requirement only permissible if the local school board determines that there is credible evidence that the home education is below the standards of the public school.
Because of NJ's explicit laws protecting the parental right to educate their children at home, the judge had only limited options when it came to personally implementing his philosophies of "monitoring" and "registering" home-schoolers." The judge cautioned that, should the school board refuse to comply with his 'suggestions', the court would "consider, by formal opinion, a request to join those parties to action." The New Jersey Department of Education website states, "The provision, "to receive equivalent instruction elsewhere than at school," in N.J.S.A. 18A:38-25 permits parent(s)/guardian(s) to educate the child at home." According to New Jersey law, parents desiring to home-school their children are not required to submit any type of communication of intent to a local school board. Parents are also not required to have their home-school curricula approved by a school board.
A NJ school board may only act against a home-schooling parent "If there is credible evidence that the parent, guardian or other person having custody and control of a school-age child is not causing the child either to attend school (public or nonpublic) or to receive equivalent instruction elsewhere than at school…" Under those circumstances, the school board is permitted to request the parents/guardians of a school age child provide proof, such as a letter of intent, that the child is receiving "equivalent instruction." The judge criticized the NJ law and lamented the fact that it upholds the rights of parents to home-school their children without interference from the government. Implying that children being educated by their parents are unsupervised, the judge stated, "This is shocking to the court. In this day and age where we seek to protect children from harm and sexual predators, so many children are left unsupervised."
The judge continued, "In today's threatening world, where we seek to protect children from abuse, not just physical, but also educational abuse, how can we not monitor the educational welfare of all our children?" He then gave the case of a recently found starving child locked "in a putrid bedroom" as an example of what happens when home-schooled children are not "registered and supervised." In what Bowman refers to as a "judicial temper tantrum" the judge opines, "This is not an attack against home schooling, but rather a statement that it is necessary to register those children for whom this alternative is chosen and to monitor that their educational needs are being adequately nurtured. Judicial interpretation of the statute requires such steps to measure 'equivalent instruction' when the alternative 'elsewhere than at school' is chosen by parents."
Bowman commented on the judge's circumvention of the law by requiring the school board to take the action that he could not, saying, "Well, state law does allow school districts to haul parents into court under state penal law if credible evidence exists that their children's education is improper. Presto! Order the local school district to charge the mom with violation of penal law! Never mind that the school district is not a party to this divorce proceeding. Never mind that "[t]he mere fact that a child has been withdrawn to be home-schooled is not, in itself, credible evidence of a legal violation."" Bowman summed up the opinion saying, "The court's opinion seethes with contempt for parental primacy in education, for large religious families, and for the democratic process itself. Instead of legal reasoning, the court disgustingly showcases the prospect of children "found unfed and locked in a putrid bedroom." Bowman concluded by drawing a scary comparison between the actions of this activist NJ judge and the recent human rights violations against a home-schooling family in Germany. "It can seem distant when we hear news of police raiding homes in Germany and abducting home-schooled children, but in our small world of judicial oligarchy and broken families, Germany is not so far away after all."
To respectfully contact Jon Corzine, governor of New Jersey:
Office of the Governor, PO Box 001, Trenton, NJ 08625, 609-292-6000
www.constitutionallycorrect.com
Read Justice Zampino's full ruling
This morning at about 10 o'clock, Fox News broadcast a story about a family court judge in New Jersey who said he was "shocked" that homeschool families were not being "monitored," and said they should be. The anchorwoman and her guests gave the impression that the judge's opinion actually changed the law, and that now families would need to be monitored.
In fact, the judge did not change the law. Nothing has changed. In order to protect individual freedoms, the founders of our nation wanted to be sure that governmental power did not become overly concentrated. To prevent this, they wisely split power into three branches--legislative, judicial and executive. As the founders conceived it, the judicial branch has no power to make new laws. That power belongs to the legislature working through representatives elected by the people.
Even though the judge in this case said the homeschool laws of New Jersey should be different, it is not up to him to decide. The state of New Jersey already has laws on the books related to homeschooling, and this will only change if the people, through their elected representatives, enact a change. Furthermore, the judge's comments were "dicta"--legalese that means other judges are perfectly free to ignore the comments. Nothing the judge said in his written opinion is binding on any other judge or any other family.
The Fox News story overlooked one more important point. The judge allowed the mother to keep homeschooling--without being monitored. Even though the father had asked the judge to prohibit the mother from continuing the homeschool program, the judge's final order simply urged the parents to work out the issue among themselves, with recommendations of steps they should take to make sure the homeschool laws already on the books were obeyed. We don't expect a judge from one state to be familiar with the laws of other states. However, the judge might not have been shocked if he had been aware of the fact that New Jersey's homeschool law is similar to that of many other states.
Sincerely Yours, Scott A. Woodruff, HSLDA Staff Attorney
Ping for later
"Honerable", my Aunt Fannie...
...a family court judge in New Jersey who said he was "shocked" that homeschool families were not being "monitored," and said they should be.
----
Yes, the horrid enemies of the state, that home-schoolers are...why the very idea of the corrupt, dysfunctional government education system being trumped by a "free" citizen regarding the education of their OWN CHILDREN --- why that is just not good Marxism...such rebelious heresy must not go unpunished....
(Sounds like a line out of Star Wars from the Master of the Dark Side...)
home school
no wonder people are leaving the north in droves
Talk about liberal activists judges...
Thanks for posting!
The Mason Dixon line starts in New Jersey.
Sounds like this dad really cares about his kids.
That's why he's not there.
There's no way to determine what the children's test scores would have been, had they been taught at a school.
Apparently this lady *ahem* judge doesn't realize what a force homeschoolers are. Maybe she never heard of HR6 and what it did to wake up members of Congress.
not every mother is the best choice or capable of homeschooling. this father may have been helping her and without his help the kids may indeed be getting a substandard education.
"Honerable"
OK, that may not be the best advertisement for homeschooling, right there.....
Yes, isn't it amazing that New Jersey --of all places-- has been one of the most homeschool friendly states in the US?
I'm afraid that can only be because the Leftists here haven't gotten around to siccing the courts on homeschoolers...yet.
Hope this vindictive father doesn't ruin things for everyone in NJ by giving our hideously leftist courts (Abbott decision, arrgghh) a chance to meddle.
As a guvermint skooled persin, I must dissagree!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.