Posted on 03/08/2007 9:10:54 AM PST by LibWhacker
LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's drugs laws are driven by "moral panic" and should be replaced by a more flexible approach that recognises most drug users harm neither themselves nor those around them, a two-year study concluded on Thursday.
Drug use should be treated as a health issue and not just as a matter for police and courts, said a commission formed by the Royal Society of Arts (RSA).
It said the current Misuse of Drugs act was "not fit for purpose" and should be scrapped.
"Current policy at best gives mixed messages and at worst is dishonest ... It is driven more by 'moral panic' than by a practical desire to reduce harm," the commission said in a report.
Professor Anthony King of Essex University, who chaired the RSA commission, told BBC radio that the current legal split of drugs into just three classes of increasing harm should be replaced.
"At the moment you have this ridiculous ABC classification, which is very crude, very inflexible," he said. "Drug users pay no attention do it. We want something that is more elaborate, more subtle, more flexible."
But he said the commission did not want to decriminalise drug use.
"You should take all of the substances that can cause harm, draw up an index of harms that they do cause ... and look at them coolly and rationally and decide what policy approach is most appropriate to each of those substances," he said.
"Illegal drugs do cause harm. Our approach is directed at trying to reduce those harms."
King said the great majority of people who used illegal drugs did not harm themselves or cause anyone else any trouble.
"Their only problem is that they are breaking the law in possessing drugs," he said.
The RSA commission called for a new Misuse of Substances Act which would regulate illegal drugs alongside alcohol, tobacco, proscribed medicines and other legal drugs.
Drug consumption rooms, or "shooting galleries", should be made available for users.
The bulk of drugs education should be moved to primary schools, it said, adding that the only practical drugs message for secondary pupils was "harm reduction".
Former Conservative leader Iain Duncan Smith agreed that Britain's drugs laws were "chaotic" but said the study had ignored the need to help addicts get off drugs.
The Home Office said the government's drugs strategy had been a success, with record numbers of people entering and staying in treatment.
"However, we are not complacent and we will continue to look to improve our work in this area wherever we can," it said.
"Drug consumption rooms, or "shooting galleries", should be made available for users. "
They tried this in Vancouver BC and oddly enough got more users in town than ever before.
I guess that anybody can get money to come up[ with ANY study conclusion.
Drugs hurt precisely those in the above sentence!
I would wish drug users in the families of those who came to this ridiculous conclusion.
Oh yeah, those who commissioned the study WERE on drugs!
The family of the last drug user I knew ended up losing their house because he spent all their savings on drugs.
I wonder if I should ask the wife if she feels harmed.
I don't see drug use as a health matter, or a matter for police and courts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.