To: mnehrling
It's early and there's time for someone to work to win us over. There's a lot to like about Fred, although I have a similar concern that I have for Duncan Hunter - what executive expertise do they bring to the table?
Remember Newt before 1994? He was awesome. He took no prisoners - just pounded the issue.
He used to be rock solid, great ideas. But he didn't do as well as an actual leader- he couldn't handle the dirt that the Dems were dishing. Well that's a problem if you are looking for a President. Since his resignation, it seems that the members of both houses have been wobblier on conservative issues.
There are several considerations in choosing a leader of this country. It's up to those in or considering joining the race to do the work and make the case to us.
12 posted on
03/08/2007 9:14:47 AM PST by
saveliberty
(Liberalism (called Middle of the Road by MSM) = You are free to do as you are told.)
To: saveliberty
...Fred, although I have a ...concern ...- what executive expertise do they bring to the table?He may not have been an executive, but he could play one on televiion.
16 posted on
03/08/2007 9:19:14 AM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(] Tagline Under Construction [)
To: saveliberty
I like Newt and Hunter, however, they both fit in the preach to the choir standard.. IMHO, both lack the charisma & marketability to sell conservatism outside the choir. .this was Reagan's big strength.. I don't believe either Newt or Hunter can effectively market conservatism to the masses.. we need a true conservative who also is marketable and charismatic.
40 posted on
03/08/2007 9:42:49 AM PST by
mnehring
(Anyone who is with you 80% percent of the time is your 80% friend, not. your 20% your enemy- Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson