Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

I think Fitzgerald had some personal animus towards Libby. He didn't like the fact that Libby called Mark Rich to congratulate him on his pardon even though Libby was the VP's Chief of Staff. I think it was payback.




Libby was Mark Rich's attorney.

Also, this notion that the administration could have done something is absurd. The justice department, under the leadership of John Ashcroft, was compelled to investigate what could have been a crime ("could have" being the operative term) and Fitzpatrick was appointed the case. That's their job. That's his job. Nothing more, nothing less.

Turns out that thru the course of the investigation it was discovered that there was no outing, but during that investigation, Libby obstructed justice by lying about it. A crime. The end.

Now what in holy hell was Team Bush supposed to do about that in practical terms? Have Fitzpatrick's knees broken? Seriously, what is it you Bush bashers expected here?


160 posted on 03/08/2007 11:32:46 AM PST by countreegurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: countreegurl

Please see my post # 166.


173 posted on 03/10/2007 1:40:21 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson