"Thank you for your opinion, pardon if I disagree."
Pardon me for interrupting zero, but JC has STILL not replied to my post #1394 on the Rudy thread, in which I answered in DETAIL his challenge to tell him why Rudy is hands-down the best candidate to prosecute the war on terror.
Instead ole JCEccles did a disappearing act (even though the thread went way past 2000 posts).
Looks like when the kitchen gets hot, he skips or suggests other FReepers ought to be kicked off FR.
Now what kind of legal reasoning is that, JC?
Or was Zero's offense his pointing out that Ann Coulter is becoming an embarassment. Her comment was either:
a. A joke - in which case it was offensive, and bombed; or
b. An attempt at political 'discourse' of the lowest order, vile and disgusting.
Oh, but I forget. ITS ALL ABOUT ANN. And as long as Ann gets her name in the paper, who cares what impact her words have. Her act wore thin a few years ago when she crossed from satire and biting sarcasm into "shock-jock" territory.
Yeah, she sells books. But she is still an ill-mannered - (TEMPER, TEMPER, DON'T SAY IT! DON'T SAY IT!)....individual. (*WHEW*)
...of course the previous post is about Coulter's comment at CPAC about John Edwards, and has nothing to do with this article....