I have to respectfully disagree.
He documents the culpability of the FBI, CIA and other agencies for failing to stop Osama bin Laden's 12 year juggernaut.
He thoroughly rejects any idea of government involvement except for covering their butts after the fact.
here's a good idea of what he is saying
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=16795
It's true that he is associated with ultra left wing crap like the huffin' puff post and, the reason I won't read the book, he appears to despise "Bush 41" and "Bush 43" and will admit to "President Clinton" being to blame when asked.
I think he's managed to connect all the dots better than all others.
Perhaps I'm thinking of Lance's case of BDS. I'll do some digging about it.
Good conservatives protest, it's just not fa-a-a-a-air. No way did the White House or anyone do anything meant to get CIA legendary and preeminent hero agent Plame killed to get back at a hero in his own right, Amb. Wilson.
Meanwhile the left's lies have circled the globe umpteen times and their vitriol eats away while good conservatives daintily debate using polite oft-heard arguments (I am listening to Rush).
The left done it in the 1950s, they done it ever since, they done done it again, "good" conservatives. You never learn. It's what they do.
Keep on truckling, man!