Posted on 03/07/2007 8:06:23 AM PST by LibertarianInExile
ASHVILLE, Tenn. — A Southern Baptist leader said Tuesday that evangelical voters might tolerate a divorced presidential candidate, but they have deep doubts about GOP hopeful Rudy Giuliani, who has been married three times.
Richard Land, head of public policy for the Southern Baptist Convention, told The Associated Press that evangelicals believe the former New York City mayor showed a lack of character during his divorce from second wife, television personality Donna Hanover.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Yeah that true turn out Jane Wyman left him for that p***y Lew Ayres
Lew Ayres please that p***y was in that movie All Quiet on Western Front
"This is good, if you trust the US Constitution as written by the framers.
JP Stephens and Ruth Bader (at a minimum) will be goners during the next few years. Pick the candidate you trust to replace them."
I intend to do just that. I will not pick Rudy, because I trust the "Constitution as written" but I do not trust Rudy's promises, whether written, spoken, or in sign language. The man has proven many times that he will say whatever he has to to get elected.
Come think of it Ronnie is comitted to marriage first marriage 10 years
his second years to Nancy 51 years that not bad for Hollywood and Wash DC
It isn't Rudy's multiple divorces that worry me as much as his stance on social issues such as abortion and homosexual marriage.
One can forgive and still know that the characteristics displayed by a person disqualify him/her for a position of power.
Ah, he *said* he's going to. How many times did he say "til death do us part"?
Maybe YOU should get your facts straight before slandering a wonderful man. That is just DISGUSTING.
Wyman was having an affair. Reagan didn't want the divorce.
The site must be good if my company sees fit to block it!
He divorced Jane Wyman in 1948 and married Nancy in 1952.
Reagan first met Nancy in 1951. Source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/firstladies/nr40.html
I don't care about THE NUMBER of his divorces, either. It's that he obviously didn't care enough about his kid to divorce quietly, publicly floozying around while both he and his wife were Gracie residents. I don't like his stances on a lot of the issues, but what first and fundamentally bothers me about him is his untrustworthiness as exhibited by that whole situation. When he runs, he's making a commitment to his party's constituents, and at least nominally, conservatives are part of the GOP's base. If Rudy, knowing the hurt it will cause his children, could treat their mother so poorly, it doesn't seem to me he's committed to much, and as a result, not much is stopping him from any random act he cares to take. He and the rest of the Rudy McRomney squad, well, who knows what they'll 'believe' now out of expediency, and reverse entirely when elected?
Absolutely. So when Rudy claims that he will not push his socially liberal agenda if elected, I can't believe him.
Shocked, i tell ya!
I was going to make a few comments about Rudy Giuliani but you have to ride the boxcar to Indoctrination Camp if you use the words "lisping liberal twit."
Take me off your ping list immediately.
It's not a ping list, silly! I just type up whomever's name I think really would be interested in such facts.
Have a great day, sweetie. Bless your heart.
Take me off your damned ping list. Unless you don't mind getting pinged by me to the good news about Rudy. You know, the numerous articles that show he's the frontrunner and that Republicans typically stick with their frontrunner.
Don't ping me again.
It's not a ping list, silly! I just type up whomever's name I think really would be interested in such facts.
Have a great day, sweetie. Bless your heart.
A troll, no doubt about it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.