To: AmishDude
For cause? They have as many as they need. They didn't even try with this guy. They wanted him on the jury.
We KNEW before the trial started that this guy worked at the WaPo and that he used to work for Woodward. It came out in voir dire, and it was reported. The defense decided they wanted him anyway.
69 posted on
03/07/2007 9:29:31 AM PST by
lugsoul
(Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
To: lugsoul
Makes me wonder if the defense had any interest in winning the case?
72 posted on
03/07/2007 9:30:47 AM PST by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Championship U)
To: lugsoul
Yeah, but if you start objecting to every juror, the judge shuts you down. Sorry, the judge should have dismissed this guy without word one from the defense.
78 posted on
03/07/2007 9:35:32 AM PST by
AmishDude
(It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson