To: veronica
Libby is a lawyer, and seemed to be very involved in his own defense. Why didn't he demand the guy be stricken?
I'm guessing they thought a reporter would know how slimy reporters are, and took that chance.
Though, like BillyJeff, it is likely Libby won't be a lawyer for much longer.
47 posted on
03/07/2007 8:44:31 AM PST by
lugsoul
(Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
To: lugsoul
Did anyone ever consider this reporter to be a plant by the DNC? This is a Washington Court Room.
48 posted on
03/07/2007 8:48:14 AM PST by
bmwcyle
(It is time to stop the left at the wall.)
To: lugsoul
Go ahead. Defend this.
This guy didn't just have a general political conflict of interest, he knew the witnesses. The judge should have dismissed him. Libby shouldn't have had to use any challenges against this guy -- unless he lied.
How many damned objections do you think they have?
62 posted on
03/07/2007 9:05:58 AM PST by
AmishDude
(It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
To: lugsoul
What about Russert? The man should be in jail for life for perjuring himself like that.
64 posted on
03/07/2007 9:06:39 AM PST by
AmishDude
(It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson