Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ReleaseTheHounds
"Makes you wonder what the heck Libby's attorney was thinking... Amazing."

You've got to realize, jury selection is very limited in Federal Courts. Generally Judges get to ask the questions and the amount of peremptory strikes is quite limited. Who knows what kind of juror was next in line to get stuck with if this guy had been stricken. Given a D.C. jury pool it is literally a situation where you have to decide on the best of the worst. The deck was stacked from the beginning. It was a reverse O.J.

24 posted on 03/07/2007 7:55:55 AM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: joebuck

If you are going to base much of your defense on impeaching Russert, then I'd rather have the most liberal of libs on the jury than one of Russert's buddies.


37 posted on 03/07/2007 8:07:58 AM PST by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: joebuck
Gawd. More tin foil.

If you've stricken a jury, you have to know that if the defense wanted to get rid of this guy with a personal relationship with prosecution witnesses, they wouldn't have had to use a peremptory strike.

74 posted on 03/07/2007 9:32:55 AM PST by lugsoul (Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson