To: lugsoul
I know you're a lawyer and all, and you obviously know the judicial system backwards and forwards, but you don't have to be a sanctimonious, snarky jerk about it:
I used to think there were people on this forum who knew less then you do about our judicial system.
I'm a writer, BTW, and I can't believe a lawyer doesn't know the difference between then and than.
158 posted on
03/08/2007 3:48:05 AM PST by
IrishRainy
(I used to NEVER finish anything, but now I)
To: IrishRainy
I can't believe a writer doesn't know a typo when he sees it.
161 posted on
03/08/2007 5:38:03 AM PST by
lugsoul
(Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
To: IrishRainy
With regard to the substance, I was responding to one who adamantly claimed that slots on a jury should be parceled out by political party identification.
I'm sorry if you don't see the utter folly in that, as well as the offense to the common law jury system. But that is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard.
Perhaps we should apportion seats on the jury by hair color, too.
162 posted on
03/08/2007 5:41:09 AM PST by
lugsoul
(Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson