Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CutePuppy
I was talking about this over lunch and they said one news report indicated they had already used up all their challenges when this character came along. Still, I wonder if it might be a ground for reversal that the judge didn't strike him for cause because he was personally acquainted with so many of the witnesses. Obviously, he had a huge influence on the jury.
131 posted on 03/07/2007 1:40:43 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker

I think entire makeup of the jury should be an appellate issue, as it goes directly to the "fair trial by jury of one's peers".

I understand change of venue had been denied by the judge, so his would be an accumulative appeal issue. Otherwise it's an issue of legalized corruption favoring one political class or group over others.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=fair-trial+jury-of+peers


132 posted on 03/07/2007 1:52:41 PM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson