I think this Rudy "I am pro-choice and I believe presidents generally appoint people on the Supreme Court that they believe agree with them" confession should be posted to every thread and every post that tries to claim that the pro-choice Rudy would appoint any other kind of judge other than a pro-choice judge.
The man is an admitted abortionist and he most definitely will appoint abortionists to the court! He believes in "a woman's RIGHT to choose" and that Roe vs Wade is constitutional.
16 posted on 03/06/2007 11:11:48 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Rudy's own words say that a Presidents views on social issues make a difference.
Both of Bush's very good Supreme Court Justices testified that Roe deserves the respect of precedent. Repeal is not likely, in any event. Rudy will appoint strict constructionists. That is good. Imagine who Hildebeast or Osamma would appoint?
The premise that "Presidents generally appoint people on the Supreme Court that they believe agree with them" is only part of the story.
We know from our own experience that a president's judicial nominees are subject to intense scrutiny by outside forces----the president's political supporters.
The presidential nominee may or may not survive the scrutiny-----I give you Harriet Meirs.
Irregardless of the crumbs he's throwing to conservatives about potential nominees, Rudy is joined at the hip to NARAL, Planned Parenthood, and the most radical pro-abortion elements.
You can bet your bottom dollar judicial picks will be scrutinized, decided upon, and seated, by the NARAL crowd. NO WAY would NARAL permit their boy Rudy to install conservative-leaning judges.
Anybody who believes Rudy would seat conservative judges is smoking something illegal.
The pro-abortion savages have commenced the killing of the innocents. Who knows where it will stop with Rudy controlling the levers of government, and NARAL whispering in his ear?