You keep saying that, doesn't make it true. I say it will be your fault for putting forth a candidate who we can't vote for, who's right? -- therefore it is a poor argument on your part.
"I say it will be your fault for putting forth a candidate who we can't vote for, who's right? -- therefore it is a poor argument on your part."
Except that I'm not "putting forth a candidate." I'm voting for the person who I think has the optimal combination of right ideas and electability. Very seldom in our history have those two characteristics come together into one candidate. I can only think of Reagan and possibly Bush.
I guess the answer to your question boils down to how much difference one sees between the Dem and GOP candidate. Some claim here that they see little or no difference. But what I've tried to argue that I see far less difference between what America would look like under Reagan and under Giuliani than the gap I see between Reagan and H. Clinton.