[Gop1040]

If he changed his position, he'd be flip-flopping like a fish out of water ala Romney. He said he would appoint SC Justices like Roberts and Scalia.....that's enough for me.

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

He said he would appoint SC Justices like Roberts and Scalia

I'm convinced!

YES! The SC Justices he would appoint would be human, breathe oxygen, exhale carbon dioxide and have been born since 1900.

JUST LIKE Roberts and Scalia.

Yes! Vote early and often for Rudy!

I'm convinced!

Cheers!

[FreeReign]

If he changed his position, he'd be flip-flopping like a fish out of water ala Romney. He said he would appoint SC Justices like Roberts and Scalia.....that's enough for me.

In the general election, I'll take the chance that Rudy would appoint anti Roe v. Wade judges.

In the primaries however, I will support the candidate who is the best social and fiscal conservative.

[supercat]

If he changed his position, he'd be flip-flopping like a fish out of water ala Romney. He said he would appoint SC Justices like Roberts and Scalia.....that's enough for me.

So in other words, rather than go with someone who says he's changed his positions to match yours, you'd rather go with someone who hasn't in the hopes that he's changed them without saying so!?

Even in my liberal days I would have had some difficulty making sense of that logic (though in my liberal days I could probably have managed it).

[garjog]

"he would appoint SC Justices like Roberts and Scalia.....that's enough for me."

While I would prefer a pro-life candidate, I can't help but remember how poorly conservative Republicans did in the last election.

If Rudy is the nominee, then the alternative is so much worse that we really do need to get behind him.

The Dems all promise to appoint baby killing judges.

Do we want a to back a loser like Dole again?