Posted on 03/06/2007 4:39:09 PM PST by Kid Shelleen
I know what you are saying. The whole Fitzgerald case was a witch-hunt and I do have sympathy for Libby, but he doesn't seem squeaky clean enough to have been Cheney's Chief of Staff. Perhaps a lapse of judgment.....
I'm not sure it's accurate to tar Libby with the Rich brush.
Yeah, sure he will. Not! If Bush had any ba!!s left he would do it tomorrow with a special TV brief and call the trial a miscarriage of justice.
England is the one who shared their "secret" info with us; we weren't trying to make THEM believe something.
I agree...but, seriously, I can't imagine Bush not giving Libby a pardon before he leaves office.
There was NO "revolution" during the 8 long years of Bill Clinton's presidency and there won't be any uprising, if, GOD FOREBID, there is a Hillary *spit* one.
Exactly so.
True..... any courage in America has been shipped to Iraq or Afganistan..
Could be WHY there is a war in Iraq..
You know .... to insure there will be no civil war in the U.S..
Any non military in the U.S. are way to cowardly.. old .. or metrosexual.. or ditzy females..
This decision shows why DC has become a bed of illiterate liberal idiots.
This decision is more dangerous to White Conservative Males than Ben Laden and al Qaeda. Now we can be found guilty for any imaginary crime the liberals come up with.
Sandy Berger walks with an admitted act of theft of top secret documents and treason. Libby is charged and found guilty with an imaginary crime.
In any event Libby is a Republican and works for Dick Cheney to some liberals and to the media that in itself deserves Capital Punishment.
In contrast the national security advisor to President Bill Clinton, risking his livelihood, and his liberty stole classified documents from the national archives and destroyed them. He knew that this was a crime but the travesty is that he stole these documents in the midst of a bi-partisan commission's investigation into the terrorist attacks of 911. The implication of this act is treason.
The key questions, still unanswered are who was Mr. Berger covering up for? Was it his own mistakes as National Security Advisor that would be embarrassing to be made public by the 911 commission? Or, was he in fact covering up for mishandlings by Bill Clinton? History will never be able to re-create facts that were in those destroyed documents and therefore we may never know why the government failed to stop 911 from happening.
Almost 3000 Americans were murdered and the crime to cover up the facts surrounding that is largely unpunished. Mr. Berger is a liberal Democrat who worked for former President Bill Clinton. Being a Liberal Democrat who worked for the media beloved Bill Clinton got him a pass. So much for the balanced scales of justice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.