Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libby found Guilty
CNN.com ^ | 03/06/2006

Posted on 03/06/2007 9:22:15 AM PST by LM_Guy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-217 next last
To: DeerfieldObserver
This reminds me of Martha Stewart. Never charged with insider trading, but convicted on perjury.

Yep, in the Stewart case they never investigated the guy in the government who told them the drug was not going to be approved in the first place!

41 posted on 03/06/2007 9:41:07 AM PST by Mark was here (Hard work never killed anyone, but why take the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

It's foreboding and chilling.


42 posted on 03/06/2007 9:41:27 AM PST by 353FMG (I never met a liberal I didn't dislike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65
Sadly, you may be right about the border agents.
However, Bush is known for loyalty. He knows Libby personally and clearly is a friend of Cheneys. He will pardon him.
43 posted on 03/06/2007 9:43:22 AM PST by Bainbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

Bush should pardon him.


44 posted on 03/06/2007 9:43:40 AM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joeystoy

You got that right. Libby specifics aside, cases like this make it very easy to understand why so many witnesses to real crime refuse to say anything. Witnesses probably have more to fear from zealous investigators and prosecutors looking to convict anybody of anything than the possibility of retribution from criminals.

I often cannot remember things I did or said yesterday. Since this infallibility of mine can apparently put me in prison for many years if authorities every come knocking, I would be inclined to say nothing. No acknowledgement. No denial. Nothing perhaps just offering up a confused look and saying "Have a nice day. Buh-bye now."


45 posted on 03/06/2007 9:43:42 AM PST by CountryBumpkin (Liberalism = Arbitrarily defining 'truth' according to immediate wants and needs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

So, Shrillery, who really is guilty of such many times over . . . runs for President and Libby goes to jail?

Isn't there some law against arbitrary selective prosecution????

GRRRRRRR


46 posted on 03/06/2007 9:44:28 AM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE; LOVE GOD WHOLLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thorin
Dittos.
47 posted on 03/06/2007 9:44:30 AM PST by Bainbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy
Sandy Berger gets a $50,000 fine, and otherwise walks. He actually committed felony acts that compromise national security. Scooter Libby is found guilty of obstruction of what justice, as no crime was ever committed, or even charged? This is an opportunistic Democrat fishing expedition gone bad... and Libby is paying for it. Shumer and Fitzfong should be charged and indicted, if justice is even and issue.
48 posted on 03/06/2007 9:44:43 AM PST by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Its a mockery of justice.

Of course it is.

But you have to understand that liberals literally have a different meaning for the word "justice". I highly recommend reading A Conflict of Visions, by Thomas Sowell. He explains this point very well.

Essentially, liberals define "justice" by the outcome, not by the process. If their guy, their cause, their goals aren't victorious, then there was no "justice". The way that "justice" is brought about is entirely beside the point. It's about who wins.

Liberals will declare that "justice" was done in this case, because their cause was victorious. The symbolic victory--Cheney is who they're really after--is theirs. What ever cheating, violations of rules or blatant bias existed in the courtroom, that's "justice" by the liberal definition of the word.

Conservatives, by comparison, define "justice" by the fairness of the process. If all the rules were followed, and everyone did their jobs honestly and to the best of their abilities, then justice was probably done. At least, it's the closest imperfect people can get to it.

The correct outcome usually follows the correct application of "justice" in the process.

That's just not the way a liberal sees it.

49 posted on 03/06/2007 9:46:42 AM PST by TChris (The Democrat Party: A sewer into which is emptied treason, inhumanity and barbarism - O. Morton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: padre35
GWB should have let the staffers take the 5th,

Well it was Libby's own right to take the fifth if he wanted to, shoulda done it.
50 posted on 03/06/2007 9:48:16 AM PST by starbase (Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy
What a travesty......

This violates everything we know about perjury charges, from the original intent of the investigation, to motive.

This is nonsense, and must be taken to the highest courts of appeal, no matter what the cost.

I'm in for whatever donations I can spare and I am practically impoverished. Frankly, I could care less about Scooter. This is a matter of Yellow Prosecution and a bad case to begin with. Who is the real law violator????.

Just a travesty of justice.

51 posted on 03/06/2007 9:48:28 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

Silver Lining.

Libby will have the standing and the resources to take this to SCOTUS which should deliver a precedent that there must be an underlying crime to establish a charge of Obstruction of Justice.


52 posted on 03/06/2007 9:49:24 AM PST by rwilson99 (Al Gore causes Global Cooling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

He's probably guilty we should move on.


53 posted on 03/06/2007 9:49:43 AM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

Any verdict based on Tim Russert telling the truth is fatally flawed.


54 posted on 03/06/2007 9:50:08 AM PST by Doctor Raoul (What's the difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic? The Free Clinic knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; Hildy

Yes, he will get the opportunity to appeal.


55 posted on 03/06/2007 9:50:25 AM PST by RebekahT ("Government is not the solution to the problem, our government is the problem." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Agent Smith
No, this is part of the retaliation for their king getting nailed on the same charge ... lying to a grand jury.

I hate like hell to admit that we are quite possibly seeing the crumbling of American jurisprudence and ultimately .. the destruction of America.

Remember ... Clintigula and its bwitch are no longer on the sidelines .... they're front and center, in our face and more dangerous now than a few hours ago.

The bwitch's southern drawl gaffe just disappeared.

56 posted on 03/06/2007 9:51:12 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: padre35
GWB should have let the staffers take the 5th,

There was no such restriction from the President.

57 posted on 03/06/2007 9:51:33 AM PST by Doctor Raoul (What's the difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic? The Free Clinic knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

Good grief! Plame & Wilson get off scot free while sending an innocent man to jail. Smacks of the clintoons.


58 posted on 03/06/2007 9:52:23 AM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

Libby was convicted of...???
and may be going to jail, for ...???

Berger steals original documents from the National Archives, gets caught, plants flowers for 100 hours in the National Mall and returns to public life in a possible Mrs. Bill Clinton administration?

What's up with that?!


59 posted on 03/06/2007 9:52:31 AM PST by ncphinsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CountryBumpkin

Oops. "Infallibility" should be "fallibility". Hope I don't get sent to prison over this. ;)


60 posted on 03/06/2007 9:52:43 AM PST by CountryBumpkin (Liberalism = Arbitrarily defining 'truth' according to immediate wants and needs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-217 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson