To: prairiebreeze
"Apparently some of the jurors have been commenting that Libby was essentially small fish and "Where's Rove, Where's Cheney?""
When that reporter said that I thought that was grounds right there for a mistrial. Why was that important in the jury's discussions? That comment shows clearly they wanted to bring someone down and they wish it could have been Rove or Cheney instead of Libby.
This isn't gonna end here. Next we're gonna see the dems come after Cheney viciously. I believe this will give more amunition to the dems to start impeachment proceedings against Bush as well.
All I can say about the jury's decision is--it sucks!
852 posted on
03/06/2007 10:29:22 AM PST by
dmw
(Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
To: dmw
This isn't gonna end here. Next we're gonna see the dems come after Cheney viciously. I believe this will give more amunition to the dems to start impeachment proceedings against Bush as well. All I can say about the jury's decision is--it sucks! Jurors convicts Libby. Congress convicts Cheney and Bush. Democracts assume Presidency. President appeases terrorists. Terrorists nuke D.C.. Jurors are toast.
954 posted on
03/06/2007 10:54:30 AM PST by
6SJ7
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson