To: LS
"How can you NOT put Wilson/Plame on the stand????"
Because the judge said Plames's status and the war in Iraq were off limits; of course, then he let Fitz rant about Plame and the Iraq war. I think Napalitano is wrong, and that there are good grounds for appeal.
To: Steve_Seattle
Wells speaking now. They will appeal!
352 posted on
03/06/2007 9:29:38 AM PST by
StarFan
To: Steve_Seattle
Napalitano is an idiot..and a lib...
381 posted on
03/06/2007 9:33:23 AM PST by
Txsleuth
(I don't know who I am voting for yet...just window shopping.)
To: Steve_Seattle
I'm no lawyer, but lawyers are smart enough to put people like this on the stand under other auspices, even when a judge says certain things are "off limits." If nothing else, I would think they could be called as rebuttal witnesses to Russert or one of the others who said they "heard it" from Libby. But if the issue is that Libby said, flatly, he did not TALK to Russert, and they proved he did, he's in heap big trouble.
492 posted on
03/06/2007 9:46:37 AM PST by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson