Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Txsleuth
How does this help Wilson? Libby was never charged with outing Plame, nobody was. Isn't that what the Wilson suit is about?

Seems to me that as soon as Armitage admitted it was he who revealed Plame as a CIA agent, Libby was off the hook in that suit.

In the end Bush will pardon everyone involved in this case in about 23 months. The appeals will take that long for sure, so nobody does jail time.

285 posted on 03/06/2007 9:22:51 AM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]


To: Eagles Talon IV
No, Libby was not off the hook no matter what Armitage or anyone else said. If I understand this right, Fitzy asks, say, "Do you have a marble in your pocket?" (answer: "Yes.") Question: "Did you talk to Tim Russert?" (answer: "No.") Fitzy produces evidence that he in fact told something to Russert. The nature of what he told Russert is irrelevant if he said he had not talked to Russert. Anyway, I'm basing this on what Rush is saying and what Andrew Napolitano was saying, that basically Libby was viewed as having lied about who he talked to, not WHAT HE TALKED about. It appears Libby got really bad legal advice here, and should have taken the stand.
391 posted on 03/06/2007 9:34:10 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson