Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: homer777

the entire grand jury was a perjury trap. it wasn't investigating any actual crime once the facts regarding her status (not covert) were understood.


1,018 posted on 03/06/2007 11:11:37 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 988 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview

"the entire grand jury was a perjury trap. it wasn't investigating any actual crime once the facts regarding her status (not covert) were understood."

All Libby had to do was not lie and he could not have been convicted of perjury or obstruction of justice. Libby's crime was lying to investigators. Plame status was and is irrelevant to Libby's crimes.

The whole issue of whether leaking Plame's name was a crime or not wasn't even part of this trial. If that were the issue in this trial then the facts surrounding her status would have been relevant, but for the purposes of this trial, those facts are irrelevant and always will be irrelevant


1,039 posted on 03/06/2007 11:17:04 AM PST by homer777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1018 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview
Yep, lol, as if Libby, a lawyer, would lie over and over and over to numerous law enforcement, about conversations with his enemies, the MSM, knowing those dozens of people who could testify against him? When he could have taken the 5th?

Fitz had ZERO evidence to back up any lying, unlike with Stewart who tampered with phone logs.

It was a he said she said, it was faulty, confused, and erred memories of everyone who testified.

Fitz had discretion, like all Pros, he did not use it because this was political, and he knew he could get a political jury in DC.

Very simple.
1,055 posted on 03/06/2007 11:20:20 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1018 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson