"Clearly he was saying he'd like to appeal to a large range of interests, and not just "the Democratic Line" as you dishonestly try to represent."
No, clearly he is the immoral and slimy politician trying to get everyone to like him.
Am I dishonestly representing him when I claim he is a pro-choice, pro-sanctuary city philanderer? That's your guy, huh? Wow, now I am impressed with YOUR analytical capability.
The weak G-libs are getting nervous. Don't worry; we will welcome you back conditionally when you realize the error of your ways.
Here's the difference between you and I:
I will fully support whichever candidates are nominated for POTUS and VP in 2008.
Just for the record, my current top choices are Newt, Romney, Giuliani, Jim Gilmore, and Huckabee.
Why would I be "nervous"?