Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RichInOC
I think I might rather say impassioned rather than fierce, but that aside, I think you have a good point there.

In coming up with the word "fierce", I was trying to find the word to best describe a mother defending her cub. To say the mother was "impassioned" would be far too mild, but to describe her as "vicious" would suggest that defense of her cub was secondary to her interest in attacking other animals.

If someone uses a shovel in self-defense because it happens to be the only weapon handy, striking one's attacker until they are clearly not a threat would be fierce. Continuing to beat them into a bloody pulp even after they are quite conspiciously dead would be vicious. Fierceness is good, but viciousness is not; coroner's-inquest problems notwithstanding, someone who continues beating an attacker who's already dead may fail to notice the other attacker sneaking up from behind.

90 posted on 03/04/2007 4:13:15 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: supercat

Okay, fair enough. I think the basic point is good...we can go hard at these guys without hating them or being hateful ourselves.


91 posted on 03/04/2007 4:31:20 PM PST by RichInOC ("Brother, we could use a man like Ronald Reagan again....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson