Well, if it is Rudy or Hillary, I think we have to go with Rudy. He is at least strong on terror and supports the effort in Iraq. Then, hopefully he has long enough coat tails to get more true conservative Republicans elected in the House and Senate and to governorships. His ONLY strength, in my opinion, is that he is strong on defense and anti-terrorism. But, the first job of the President is to defend the country and its borders. Hopefully, a strong, truly republican candidate will emerge.
Rudy - Hillary
Why, what difference would it make? Amnesty, nope -- gun control, nope -- health care, nope -- abortion, nope -- global warming, nope -- taxes, you're kidding right .... let's see there must be some difference in there somewhere. Maybe on the Iraq war, but it's either done in Iraq by 2008, or it's cooked. Terror, doubtful there is going to be any real difference, until the nukes go off.
Agreed -- The best thing to do is elect a good Conservative Representative and Senator. Put Mitch in charge of the Senate.
I refuse to change the definitions so as to vote for anyone.