"The remote viewing aspect was just a small part of the over all research effort, reportedly. They just noted that it all agreed with what they'd found otherwise."
Thats like saying you read the future in chicken guts and they agreed, too.
Thats like saying you read the future in chicken guts and they agreed, too.
= = =
Yes and no.
1. I've learned personally to not throw puzzle pieces away no matter how unrelated or unreliable they may seem at the time in one light and one context.
2. It was the fringe off the wall groups who earliest and most accurately predicted what Hitler would do.
3. I don't know what I think of remote viewing. But it is entirely possible that such are tapping into knowledge via
A) demons
and/or
B) ET's
which comes somehow outside of our time/space dimension but is accurate; accurate with falsehoods; false totally about our time/space dimension. The evidence suggests it's a mixture of deception and truth.
But, hey, I'm just offering my perspective. Believe what you wish.
But the hypotheses which take into account and deal well with the widest range of complexity the most accurately stand the best chance of being most useful, fruitful and . . . protective.
Life is complex. All this is very complex. It's going to get worse.