"If your proof point graphic is so important to your case, why don't you make it correct instead of hiding behind an 'imaginary disclaimer' or 'color coding'?"
Because I guess the people who made it assume, perhaps falsely, that people would be intelligent enough to decode that the difference in colors plus the disclaimer means there isn't an exact match. And maybe, just maybe, they gave people to much credit by thinking they weren't in a cave and know that hillary is now trying to play the other side of the issue.
So to boil it down, your complaint is that the chart isn't sufficiently "dumbed down" and therefore requires numerous disclaimers for the lowest common denominator audience.
So to boil it down, looking at your post... facts don't matter to you.
Your weasel words and lame slam show your talking points to be the lowest common denominator of postings.