Skip to comments.
The CPAC I saw (Michelle Malkin shares her thoughts on Ann Coulter)
Michelle Malkin ^
| Sunday March 4th, 2007
| Michelle Malkin
Posted on 03/04/2007 8:28:45 AM PST by ajolympian2004
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 501-510 next last
To: LiberalGunNut
Foul whisperings are abroad: unnatural deeds
Do breed unnatural troubles: infected minds
To their deaf pillows will discharge their secrets
William Shakespeare's Macbeth
To: GoldenPup
*Sob!*
302
posted on
03/04/2007 11:43:16 AM PST
by
sauropod
("An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools." Ernest Hemingway)
To: oceanview
michelle nails it. The real question is: Who is nailing Michelle?
To: oceanview
michelle nails it.The real question is: Who is nailing Michelle?
To: AnnaZ
I wouldn't go there. Ann Coulter is no virgin and while that is her choice I don't think going Christian in the discussion is all that fitting.
305
posted on
03/04/2007 11:44:12 AM PST
by
misterrob
(Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
To: Sir Francis Dashwood
We have a presidential candidate who is just like Clinton with women, dresses up like a girl and lived with two homosexuals. We elected a guy for President who had a DUI. What's your point? I've seen the pictures, and Rudy wasn't in danger of knocking anyone dead with those legs of his. (Bada bing!)
You may find this to be a big deal, but it ain't 1952 anymore. Most Americans simply don't give a hoot, and will find your tetotaler objections quaint, at best. Blame the rise of South Park conservatism, but fewer on the right really care, either.
306
posted on
03/04/2007 11:45:05 AM PST
by
Steel Wolf
(As Ibn Warraq said, "There are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam.")
To: Sam Hill
As Reagan would say, there you go again.
ANYONE who disagrees with her holiness Ann Coulter on any issue is a "DU troll". Obviously. All hail the great Ann Coulter, hallowed be her name. Ye must post another picture to marvel her flawless beauty, lest ye be banned.
Thank you for proving my point that you Coulter worshippers. You guys are worse than the cult of Obama on the left.
307
posted on
03/04/2007 11:45:15 AM PST
by
BillyBoy
(Don't blame Illinois for Pelosi -- we elected ROSKAM)
To: an amused spectator
Obviously Sam has a different sign up date then what's posted then.
308
posted on
03/04/2007 11:45:18 AM PST
by
misterrob
(Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
To: 68 grunt
Catfight ...My money is on Coulter... two to one odds... first round by a knockout...
To: bluecollarman
Are you defending her when she is wrong?
If the shoe fits ..
310
posted on
03/04/2007 11:47:05 AM PST
by
CometBaby
(You can twist perceptions .. reality won't budge!)
To: zbigreddogz
You must be easily sickened. You also make my point. I said nothing about basic respect towards people. I just do not think that lifestyle choices deserve protected status. There are already enough protected groups in our society without adding more based on behavior. What do you think should come next? Pedophiles becoming a protected group? After all, doesn't everybody deserve basic human respect?
To: BillyBoy
Ye must post another picture to marvel her flawless beauty, lest ye be banned. Here is the Shield Maiden slaying the Witch King of Angmar...
To: sauropod
Saturday, March 03, 2007
Ann Coulter And Michael Richards
Posted by Hugh Hewitt | 11:09 AM
Ann Coulter is a political comedian who, like Michael Moore, often offends, and sometimes crosses the bounds of decency.
Yesterday she entered the territory where Michael Richards went when he employed the n-word to abuse a heckler. When Coulter employed the f-word to abuse a candidate, she made herself radioactive because the word is a simply invitation to hate. It was repulsive.
I cannot imagine Coulter being invited to any panel or television appearance on which I would want to appear. Colleges and universities must also stop inviting her to appear as a representative of the conservative movement in America. She is not. You want smart, accomplished and funny conservative women? Ask K-Lo, Laura Ingraham or Carol Liebau to appear, or chose from scores of others. But not Ann Coulter --she represents only a snarl and a deep need to be noticed.
---
Like Michelle Malkin and other conservatives who have spoken out against Ann's behaviour Hugh Hewitt is right on the mark.
To: Steel Wolf
I really don't care what you think...
To: ajolympian2004
Yesterday she entered the territory where Michael Richards went when he employed the n-word to abuse a heckler. When Coulter employed the f-word to abuse a candidate... Hey! Yo!
Being black is not the same as being a "faggot."
To: ajolympian2004
Yesterday she entered the territory where Michael Richards went when he employed the n-word to abuse a heckler. When Coulter employed the f-word to abuse a candidate...Hey! Yo!
Being black is not the same as being a "faggot."
To: jospehm20
why not look at one of the important issues here. The CPAC event was supposed to be about the candidates and instead it turns into "all about Ann" which does nothing to help the party's chances of winning elections. Instead of where candidates stand on issues and how well they did on impressing a conservative audience the focus is on Ann. Bravo. And, if people want to see a republican in the WH and in Senate and Congressional seats how does her comment go with those voters that are non aligned? My guess it not well. Ask any candidate at that speech if her comments helped the cause and all of them will say no.
I thought it was great that Cheney told Leahy to f-off but he did it to his face and in an press event.
317
posted on
03/04/2007 11:56:38 AM PST
by
misterrob
(Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
To: CometBaby
If the shoe fits ..Those shoes are defective. They will not fit anyone except a liberal.
318
posted on
03/04/2007 11:57:33 AM PST
by
bluecollarman
(awaiting tag line inspiration...)
To: cgk
I know the points Ann was making and they were good ones. But is was to easy for people to zoom in on the f-word and the tempest over that caused her points to be forgotten.
I think if she had made her points a little slower rather than going straight for the skewering like she does it would have been better for her.
Ann can take it though.
319
posted on
03/04/2007 11:58:36 AM PST
by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: ajolympian2004
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 501-510 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson